blackstonekeep.com

I noticed that the guild directory of the Starkson has not been listed for awhile.
Starkson folk, please mention your characters name that is currently in the Starkson, their postion, rank, and the tower(s) they have access to I will update the guild entry I made abit ago,
Also any important history, stories etc that need be added to the entry please post here. I'll update it soon as we start getting soem info rolling in
thanks,
~Pemm

Starkson history can be found at http://cottg.swords.cc all of it was transfered there and is under The Starkson Protectorate forums. That is also the offical website for Starkson too.

I'm sure Pharo can add to this but this is a list of the BSK Sovereigns of Starkson.

Lord Jon Stark - (Ruled for a while left then returned and was going to betray Starkson was removed)
Lady Assialia - (trapped in a crystal defending Starkson)
Lady Winesa Kenders - (Long time Sovereign retired)
Lady Platina - (Short term while Winesa was away)
Lady Ortelassa d'Streea Kallow - (Was Sovereign until BSk was taken down then moved Starkson to Kil'Dar. Is still Sovereign of Kil'Dar's branch and works with Sir Deyen.)
Lady Manx - (Sovereign for a short time then retired)
Lady Nadia - (Sovereign when no other is around perfers to be Secertary of State)
Lady Fawn - (Current Sovereign.)

Chiffawn wrote: For now, Starkson and the current administration only wish the public to know that an accurate history of Starkson is and has been in the works for some time.

If anyone reading the dissembled version of Starkson history has any questions, you may address them to Lady Fawn and she will be happy to research the accurate answer for you.

How are you collecting this history? And how do you know fact from fiction? Perhaps those who were there might know something more than you do. It's a thought. Personally I know Pharo's history to be correct and has been rped... why becuase I was there.

the future is yours to build. do not try to recreate a past you were not present for.

Pharo

I was there. For all of it, starting well before Winesa had any involvement with Starkson and became known as Lady Winesa, and I'm still there now.

I was the one who previewed Fawns words and edited what her post said. Thus, validating it to be factual. Attempting to say that the history is not by opinion and biased would be fool-hardy.

Botton line is that many seem to think these are solely Fawns words. While many are, know that if she says something I don't agree with, I'll correct it. In this though, she made sure to consult me before even making this particular post about Starkson's History because she didn't wish to be hostile or untrue at all. And she's not.

Normally I wouldn't reveal that I also play Nadia, but it seems that Hordack and Dark_777 have already revealed that information to the general population, so it doesn't matter now.

Did either of you wish to dispute the fact that Nadia/I have indeed been around and with Starkson since the time when Winesa was still a part of her evil group (which I wont name for now) and not a part of Starkson? or that perhaps I don't know the history of Starkson well enough to say what was written was biased towards the opinions and views of Winesa?

Either way, a simple fact remains true no matter if in fantasy or reality: History itself cannot be written without some bias based from the beliefs and views of the writer. Exactly why you would both jump immediately to discredit Fawn as well by saying she wasn't there and cannot say these things could only be a product of misunderstanding or a reaction to a percieved threat or attack. Relax though, my friends, as it was none of those things.

Lady Fawn DOES consult me on her actions many times (though not always), and mostly before she takes some action or another. Even though she doesn't need to, she does anyway. I might add that she's given ALOT more leeway and benefit of the doubt to certain people who I would not have.

Fawn is the Soveriegn of Starkson, sanctioned and advised by Lady Nadia Luelle. Fawn is not perfect, nor can anyone expect her to be. Last I checked, none of us can claim (truthfully) to be perfect (IC or OOC). Thus, histories aren't perfect (including mine), nor are the methods of trying to run a guild perfect. Yet so many seem to like casting those stones, don't they?

Here's a novel idea: How about members of Starkson actually play their Starkson characters in support and RP with Fawn. This way you could each see if the hype you hear about her from the mouthes of those who have some IC or OOC distain is true, or just opinion?

Jazelle~ I hope you are recovering well my dear friend, and look forward to hearing that you are bouncing around happy and healthy as can be again soon.

Pharo~ You are, and have been, a dear friend of mine for a very very long time. Your help is appreciated, though I would ask that you not take offense when something is stated to be written from your view-point, when the fact is exactly that. I could not claim any different. Besides, to say the history listed is biased from your view-point does not discredit it any, it only tells another fact. Though the rest about Nadia being sanctioned by the founders to place (sanction) and advise Starkson Leaders is quite true and was RPed about 5 weeks or so before Lady Assai's player left the server unexpectedly. Winesa didn't not come onto the Starkson scene as as even a member until Lady Assai was gone. Nothing said above by Fawn was a lie, or false, but at the same time it was not trying to make either you or Jazelle sound bad or to say everything you wrote is false. Just to correct some of it and to make it known that Starkson has a very in-depth history, which is written from the view-points of others. This includes you my dear friend, just as it includes me too.

Thanks for your understanding my dear friends,
~Demitri (aka: Lady Nadia Luelle)

Normally I wouldn't reveal that I also play Nadia, but it seems that Hordack and Dark_777 have already revealed that information to the general population, so it doesn't matter now

//Just to let you know, neither Hordack nor myself were the first to disclose that information. That can of worms has been open for quite sometime now, and had nothing to do with me//

// Demitri be mindful of your remarks and BS. I have been nice and haven't made any statements per Driller. But if you continue I will voice my complaints to Driller and send screen shots of comments that continue to be made by your member's both IC and OCC. Thank you

Normally I wouldn't reveal that I also play Nadia, but it seems that Hordack and Dark_777 have already revealed that information to the general population, so it doesn't matter now

Hordack The Dark

if any of you need some information on why the starkson was created in the first place i might be of some help. My memory might be a tad foggy but i would like to help (it is afterall quite some time ago). I used to rp with Jon even before he came up with the idea.
Even though i was never an actual member i was in in contact with all of the starksons (leaders or whatever you call em ) from the beginning to the end.

Thank you for the contributions and informations.
When time permits I will once more edit the post on the guild list.

I would appreciate a DM locking this topic however, at this point. Thanks,
~Pemmyton.