blackstonekeep.com

HelloBSK wrote:

ValentianNizzle wrote:I'm all for PvP as long as it's given consent to.

You should be ashamed of yourself

i agree with nizzle

i know, some one else used your quote to flame me (not you).... i over edit the quote, i am sorry.. i have edited my old post with the full quote now....

thank you for talking with me, instead like some other peep .... after reading many posts, some people who want chaos of the wild west they are also graping for power... i will stop there, before i say to much... if we are going to put allot of power in a player's hand, the other player should have ...

that is true, all that i am saying that the players should have a voice also.. dm_jr should be approve by both groups--- players and driller/dm K9... That just makes no sense. DMs will know much better than any player who is able to handle such a responsibility without abusing it. Heck, you might a...

*laughs* Oh my. You need to remember that this IS a game. It's owned by Atari and driller made this mod and hosts it on his computer. Your suggestion is like saying that WalMart employees should vote for WalMart's CEO. Not gonna happen. And why should it? driller did allot and allot hard work on th...

we vote on leaders of world super power with nukes, why not vote on our leaders in a game

No the player base should not have the power to chose who has the wands it should be up to the DMs and Driller himself. They know who can be trusted with such power as they will be the ones governing it. (well if it happens lol ) that is true, all that i am saying that the players should have a voi...

Youko wrote:hence the experienced and "old hat" players.

should the player s of the keep choose who have or don't have that power with driller/dm approval

also, not every player in game is on the forums, who do we get their input

some old hats are better at dm'ing then others

ok i agree, peeps will figure out who have the wand or not anyways, a title will be nice if some asking for help, they know who have that said power also, one action will lead another action so i am just making sure how the system will work.. u have won me over to your side .. now some small details...

good, i do see the usefulness of the wand and the abuses.. i have no problem if the player have a char named something like that dm_jr_charname.. in that we who has the wand and only that char can have it... some dm's have normal accounts and inverse should be true -- normal players could/should hav...

i like that idea, if we (every one in the keep) can vote who is in or out of the guild, thus making sure that it does not became a click ( super player with all his friends )

any ideas to make sure it is fair to all

And for the jerks, I have read and very much agree with the Wands of temp ban (In the right hands) being used with proof of rule breaking and or griefing actions[/quote] yes, i agree that jerks should be banned and we should not care about their feelings, but bans should not happen in the heat of th...

There's just no way that allowing PvP in the Keep will generate more RP, at least not if pickpocketing is included. On the contrary: it will discourage RP, as people will simply not dare to hang around by the tree anymore. I do see the point that it would be nice if players rather than scripts or N...

i am not accusing u of anything (stating it for the record), if a dm plays as player (yes they do, i know), (s)he can always relog as on a dm account... dm's word is law while a players word is not... i do have mixed emotions about the "wild west", but i gave it a try....

magnus wrote: I also like the idea of having some chars. with temporay boot ability, it may put an end to this type of activity.

please apply for a dm job then....